Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240478›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Urgency an important factor when assessing fecal incontinence.

Louise Almkvist, Ulf Gunnarsson, Karin Strigård

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louise AlmkvistDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. louise.almkvist@umu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2075-8228
Ulf GunnarssonDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3806-2114
Karin StrigårdDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-9133

Funding

Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement Dnr RV-967209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score contributed with complementary information to Wexner score when assessing fecal incontinence (FI). The hypothesis was that LARS score would be likely to provide complementary information to Wexner score in the assessment of FI regardless of etiology. LARS score has been used as a complement to traditional scoring systems to assess bowel dysfunction, targeting FI among patients after radical cystectomy, in women with endometriosis, and in colorectal cancer patients. Wexner score as a single tool does not address the complexity of FI and urgency, a disabling symptom. A retrospective cohort study at a surgical outpatient clinic included patients diagnosed with FI who answered LARS and Wexner scores questionnaires at their first visit to the clinic between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2018. Kendall's tau, Spearman rank correlation, Cohen's kappa, and scatterplots were analyzed for participants and specific subgroups to assess any correlation and agreement between answers to the two scoring systems. One hundred nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria, one hundred eight women and eleven men. Kendall's tau ranged from 0.32 to 0.39, indicating lack of correlation. Correlation coefficients using Spearman rank ranged from 0.36 to 0.55, i.e., only fair to moderate correlation. Kappa was 0.21-0.28, i.e., only slight to fair agreement. Distribution of LARS and Wexner scores in the scatterplot showed wide variability and lack of agreement. Combined use of both the Wexner and LARS scores provided complimentary information, and thus a more complete mapping of FI as well as taking all entities in consideration.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesSyndromeColorectal surgeryFecal incontinenceGeneral surgeryProctologyScoring methods

Identifiers

PMID39240478
PMCPMC11628434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.