ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024
Robotic parastomal hernia repair in Ileal-conduit patients: short-term results in a single-center cohort study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Parastomal hernia after robot-assisted cystectomy and ileum conduit: incidence, risk or protective factors and outcomes of minimal-invasive hernia repair-systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Management and outcomes profiles of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond acronyms: a domain-based structural analysis of abdominal wall hernia repair techniques in the contemporary literature.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive surgery for emergent parastomal hernia repair: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Single-surgeon learning curve for robotic-assisted transabdominal retromuscular repair with Hugo RAS™ surgical system.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes and risk factors for complications in robotic versus open parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- How Reproducible Are Abdominal Wall Surgical Techniques? A Methodological Assessment of Technical Reporting in the Contemporary Literature.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe and evaluate safety and feasibility of the robotic modified Sugarbaker technique with intraperitoneal underlay mesh (IPUM) for repairing parastomal hernias associated with ileal conduits (ICPSH).
methodsThis retrospective, single-center cohort study analyzed data from 15 adult patients who underwent robotic ICPSH repair using the modified Sugarbaker IPUM technique between July 2021 and July 2023. The primary endpoints were hernia recurrence rates and 30-day morbidity. Secondary endpoints included length of stay, conversion to open surgery, 30-day readmission, and 30-day reoperation.
resultsThe mean patient age was 69.1 years, and 53.3% were female. Most patients (86.6%) had undergone radical cystectomy as the index surgery. The mean operative time was 249 min, with no conversions to open surgery. The 30-day complication rate was 26.7%, and the mean hospital stay was 3.6 days. No hernia recurrences, hydronephrosis, rise in creatinine or distended conduit on imaging suggesting poor drainage were observed during a mean follow-up of 15.2 months.
conclusionsThe robotic modified Sugarbaker IPUM technique appears safe and feasible for PSH repair in IC patients, with promising short-term outcomes. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and establish its role in ICPSH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39240470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.