Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240412›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2025

Ultrasound for body composition assessment: a narrative review.

Raquel Marín Baselga, Francisco Javier Teigell-Muñoz, José M Porcel, Javier Ramos Lázaro, Samuel García Rubio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07481942 (Body Composition Adaptations Following Initiation of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender Populations.), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07481942 completednot on this map

Body Composition Adaptations Following Initiation of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy in Transgender Populations.

TypeobservationalSponsorCelia BañulsRan2017 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsTransgenderArmsgender affirming hormone therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Optimizing CT-Based Models for Predicting Whole-Body Fat in Rabbits.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raquel Marín BaselgaInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Teigell-MuñozInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Parla, Spain.
José M PorcelInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Arnau Vilanova, IRBLleida, Lleida, Spain.
Javier Ramos LázaroInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Samuel García RubioInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Santa Marina, ISS BioBizkaia, Bilbao, Spain. samuel.garciarubio@osakidetza.eus.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-9322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound has become an increasingly valuable tool for the assessment of body composition, offering several applications and indications in clinical practice. Ultrasound allows bedside evaluation of muscle mass, fat compartments, and extravascular water, providing a cost-effective, portable, and accessible alternative to traditional methods, such as Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA), Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA), Computed Tomography (CT), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). It is particularly useful in evaluating conditions, such as malnutrition, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity, which require poor muscle mass to establish a diagnosis. The potential uses of ultrasound in body composition assessment include measurement of muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, pennation angle, and echo-intensity, which are indicative of muscle health. Additionally, ultrasound can be used to evaluate various fat compartments, including visceral, subcutaneous, and ectopic fat, which are important for understanding metabolic health and cardiovascular risk. However, the widespread adoption of ultrasound is challenged by the lack of standardized measurements and the absence of ultrasound measures in the validated diagnostic criteria. This article reviews the current applications of ultrasound in body composition assessment, highlighting the recent advancements and the correlation between ultrasound parameters and clinical outcomes. It discusses the advantages of ultrasound while also addressing its limitations, such as the need for standardized protocols and cut-off points. By providing a comprehensive update based on recent publications, this article aims to enhance the clinical utility of ultrasound in assessing and monitoring body composition and pave the way for future research in this field.

Indexed as

Body CompositionElectric ImpedanceHumansUltrasonographybody compositionfat tissuemuscle masssarcopeniaUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.