Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240409›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2024

The ideal range of laser hair removal for microtia patients undergoing two-stage ear reconstruction.

Lili Chen, Yaoyao Fu, Aijuan He, Ninghua Liu, Ying Chen, Chenlong Li, Tianyu Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lili Chen *Department of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-207X
Yaoyao Fu *Department of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Aijuan HeDepartment of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Ninghua LiuDepartment of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Chenlong LiDepartment of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China. chenlong.li@hotmail.com.
Tianyu ZhangDepartment of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, China. ty.zhang2006@aliyun.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality 21DZ2200700Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality 23Y21900200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the technologies for auricular reconstruction in microtia have improved, issues such as low hairlines or excessive hair growth can still pose aesthetic problems for the reconstructed ear. Laser depilation has been reported as a solution for hair problems. However, few studies have discussed the appropriate region for hair removal. A retrospective analysis was performed on 276 patients with unilateral microtia who underwent the Nagata two-stage ear reconstruction. The gender ratio of male to female was 2.5 (198 males/78 females). Intense pulsed light depilation was used to remove hair. To determine the proper hair removal area, we measured the extent of hair removal. Before the first stage, the average vertical distance between the upper point (after localization) and hairline was 3.42 ± 4.75 mm (-10-20 mm). After the first stage, the average vertical distance between the upper point of the reconstructed ear and the hairline was 1.27 ± 2.41 mm (-10-15 mm). By using chi-square test to assess differences in hair removal success rates among various regions, we aimed to identify the suitable depilation region. Before the first stage, a depilation vertical distance ≥ 10 mm led to a 92.1% success rate. After the first stage surgery, among the patients needing additional hair removal, a vertical depilation distance ≥ 4 mm resulted in an 81.3% success rate. Based on our observation, we suggested that a depilation region of ≥ 10 mm (before the first surgery) or ≥ 4 mm (after the first surgery) would be the ideal range for laser hair removal.

Indexed as

Congenital MicrotiaHair RemovalPlastic Surgery ProceduresAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultEar reconstructionHair removalLaserMicrotia

Identifiers

PMID39240409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.