ReviewJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2025
Durable left ventricular assist devices in pediatrics: impact of body size on outcomes and size limitations.
Review in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Limitations of ventricular assist devices in pediatrics: When one size does not fit all.JHLT open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the range of body sizes in children, few ventricular assist devices (VAD) exist to support pediatric patients with end-stage heart failure. Large registry data identified weight < 20 kg to be associated with higher rates of VAD-related stroke, compared to > 40 kg. Moreover, patients < 1 years of age experience the highest post-implant mortality, with 1-year survival improving in an age-dependent manner. Within different VAD types, intracorporeal continuous (IC) devices confer the greatest clinical benefit and quality of life compared to paracorporeal alternatives. The major limitation of IC VADs is the technical challenge of implantation into patients of small body size, thus the majority of patients with IC devices are pre-adolescents or older. However, since 2021, the use of HeartMate 3™ (HM3) has expanded to patients as small as 17.7 kg. Although HM3 offers equally favorable survival outcomes irrespective of body size, patients of low body surface area are more likely to experience non-device-related major infections and renal dysfunction, with suggestion for elevated risk of major bleeding and stroke. Innovative imaging strategies have emerged to assess the feasibility of HM3 implantation and facilitate preoperative planning in small children. Moreover, the unmet need for an IC device in the infant population has revived interest in the axial pump, with a pivotal clinical trial currently underway. VAD outcomes in the pediatric population are not equivalent across all ages and body sizes, thus size-stratified analyses and device development to serve the full spectrum of body habitus are key considerations as this field rapidly evolves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39240401What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.