Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2024
The Effect of Perineum Massage Applied With and Without an Instrument in the Active Phase of Labor Birth Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPerineal massage during labor reduces the need for episiotomy and shortens the length of the episiotomy. Pregnant women should be offered instrumented (EPI-NO) or manual perineal massage in labor. This study was conducted to determine the effect of perineal massage applied with (EPI-NO) and without an instrument during the active phase of labor on episiotomy rate and episiotomy length in women who gave birth vaginally.
methodsThe study included 101 pregnant women aged 18-35 years, with gestational ages between 38 and 42 weeks and indications for vaginal delivery. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: EPI-NO massage, manual massage, and control. The perineal massage was administered during the active labor phase (4- to 8-cm dilation) for 20 min in the intervention groups. Postpartum episiotomy rates and lengths were recorded using standardized forms. The research data were collected using the Introductory Information Form and Birth Assessment Form.
resultsThe episiotomy rate was found to be 33.3% in group I, 75.0% in group II, and 74.4% in the Control group, and a statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.001; p < 0.01). The mean episiotomy length of the women was 1.5 cm (mean ± SD: 1.50 ± 1.20) for group I, 3 cm (mean ± SD 2.70 ± 1.50) for group II, and 3.5 cm (mean ± SD 3.10 ± 2.00) for the control group (p < 0.000).
conclusionPerineal massage with EPI-NO was the most effective method at decreasing the episiotomy rate and shortening the episiotomy length compared with other groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39240370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.