Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240346›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2024

Automated algorithms for seizure forecast: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ana Sofia Carmo, Mariana Abreu, Maria Fortuna Baptista, Miguel de Oliveira Carvalho, Ana Rita Peralta, Ana Fred, Carla Bentes, Hugo Plácido da Silva

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Sofia CarmoDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. ana.sofia.carmo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7954-3718
Mariana AbreuDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-6610
Maria Fortuna BaptistaNeurophysiology Monitoring Unit EEG/Sleep Laboratory, Hospital de Santa Maria, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7389-9598
Miguel de Oliveira CarvalhoNeurophysiology Monitoring Unit EEG/Sleep Laboratory, Hospital de Santa Maria, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2543-0407
Ana Rita PeraltaNeurophysiology Monitoring Unit EEG/Sleep Laboratory, Hospital de Santa Maria, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-431X
Ana FredDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-5024
Carla BentesNeurophysiology Monitoring Unit EEG/Sleep Laboratory, Hospital de Santa Maria, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-7678
Hugo Plácido da SilvaDepartment of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-8432

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) 2021.08297.BDFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) 2022.12369.BDMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior UIDB/50008/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to review the proposed methodologies and reported performances of automated algorithms for seizure forecast. A systematic review was conducted on studies reported up to May 10, 2024. Four databases and registers were searched, and studies were included when they proposed an original algorithm for automatic human epileptic seizure forecast that was patient specific, based on intraindividual cyclic distribution of events and/or surrogate measures of the preictal state and provided an evaluation of the performance. Two meta-analyses were performed, one evaluating area under the ROC curve (AUC) and another Brier Skill Score (BSS). Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria, totaling 43 included algorithms. A total of 419 patients participated in the studies, and 19442 seizures were reported across studies. Of the analyzed algorithms, 23 were eligible for the meta-analysis with AUC and 12 with BSS. The overall mean AUC was 0.71, which was similar between the studies that relied solely on surrogate measures of the preictal state, on cyclic distributions of events, and on a combination of these. BSS was also similar for the three types of input data, with an overall mean BSS of 0.13. This study provides a characterization of the state of the art in seizure forecast algorithms along with their performances, setting a benchmark for future developments. It identified a considerable lack of standardization across study design and evaluation, leading to the proposal of guidelines for the design of seizure forecast solutions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSeizuresElectroencephalographyHumansAutomated seizure forecastEpilepsymHealthSeizure likelihoodSeizuresSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39240346
PMCPMC11447137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.