ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Forensic radiology : Introduction and overview].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping two decades of forensic virtopsy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis (2006-2025).International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Automated identification of unknown decedents: matching postmortem CT images with clinical databases.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn forensic medicine, documentation of findings is essential. During an autopsy, this is usually achieved by photography. However, there are numerous injuries that remain undetected even during a classic autopsy. In recent years, the importance of forensic radiology has grown in many countries to improve the documentation of findings and to increase the quality of post-mortem examinations.
methodsWhile many methods, such as conventional X‑rays or computed tomography, can be transferred quite easily to the post-mortem field, there are other methods that are more difficult to adapt. For example, performing a post-mortem angiography requires a specific concept that allows the vascular system to be filled and a contrast agent to circulate. Performing post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging is also a challenge, as image contrast depends on the temperature of the body being examined. When applying forensic radiology on living persons in the field of "clinical forensic medicine", there are further elements to consider. In particular, the question arises if radiological methods are acceptable for purely forensic medical purposes without a clinical indication.
conclusionThis overview article is intended to explain the various methods of forensic radiology, their areas of application, and their advantages and disadvantages. It also describes important historical developments in the use of forensic radiology and its current spread in German-speaking countries as well as current and future developments. Thanks to this information and a summarizing overview table, clear indications and recommendations for the use of forensic radiology in practice can be obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.