Observational studyPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Modification and scoring of a transition tool to understand transition readiness among pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
Observational study in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA successful transition from pediatric to adult healthcare for adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients is essential for maintaining graft and overall health. Readiness for transition is multifactorial and can be challenging to assess. The purpose of this study is to describe the development of a scoring system for a transition readiness assessment for pediatric kidney transplant recipients and assess overall and domain-specific readiness for transition.
methodsThis is an observational study of adolescent and young adult kidney transplant recipients over 5 years who were given either the modified Middle (MTRC-m) or modified Late Transition Readiness Checklist (LTRC-m) during post-transplant clinic visits. We developed a scoring system for both checklists and assessed their reliability.
resultsThe MTRC-m (38 items) demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.84). The LTRC-m (43 items) demonstrated excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.90). On both the MTRC-m and LTRC-m, patients scored highest on adherence and risky behavior knowledge. Scores were lowest in the "Managing my healthcare needs (self-advocacy)" and "How I feel about myself" domains.
conclusionsA scored transition assessment allows for rapid appraisal of transition readiness within a clinic setting. We find that participants report high levels of knowledge regarding health-seeking behaviors and risky behaviors, endorse less readiness for managing their care independently, and express a moderate to high degree of worry about their future and their health. While transition programs have traditionally, and necessarily, focused on education, our results demonstrate that programs should expand to also focus on behavior performance and emotional well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39240281What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.