Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240223›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Effect of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life in recurrence-free rectal cancer survivors (LaTE study): nationwide inverse probability of treatment-weighted registry-based cohort study and survey.

Yasir G Malik, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Hanne M Hamre, Arne E Færden, Johannes K Schultz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Therapy and Watch-and-Wait for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yasir G MalikDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2389-1403
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne M HamreDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Arne E FærdenDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Johannes K SchultzDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-2087

Funding

hospital and the surgical department
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy reduces local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, but may cause harm in patients who do not experience recurrence. The aim was to investigate the impact of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life after curative treatment for rectal cancer, i.e. in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up.

methodsAll patients operated on for rectal cancer in Norway under 75 years of age between 30 September 2007 and 1 October 2020 were identified using the Cancer Registry of Norway. Exclusion criteria were distant metastasis, recurrence and dementia. The primary outcome measure was the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. Secondary outcome measures included the 36-item Short Form Survey. Inverse probability weights based on a multiple logistic regression model were used to balance prechosen covariates between the radiotherapy and no radiotherapy groups when assessing differences in outcomes.

resultsOf 5014 invited patients, 2142 (43%) eligible patients answered the questionnaires. Of these 762 (36%) were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus surgery and 1380 (64%) with surgery alone. The mean follow-up time was 6.4 and 7.4 years respectively. After propensity score matching, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index differed significantly between irradiated and non-irradiated patients ((mean(s.d.), mean score 103.8(19.4) versus 110.8(19.6) respectively, mean difference: -6.96 (95% c.i. -8.72 to -5.19); P < 0.001). Among patients without a stoma the mean difference was -8.1 points, whereas it was -5.7 for patients with a stoma. The radiotherapy group also scored significantly lower in 7 of 8 36-item Short Form Survey domains compared with the surgery alone group.

conclusionLong-term quality of life was significantly lower in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up who received radiotherapy compared with patients who did not. These findings warrant a critical re-evaluation of the use of radiotherapy both in traditional neoadjuvant treatment and in modern organ-preserving treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsRegistriesAdultAgedCancer SurvivorsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNorwayPropensity ScoreSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39240223
PMCPMC11378401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.