Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240161›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Which social determinants of health have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes? A scoping review.

Kayleigh R Majercak, Emily F Gorman, Nicholas J Robert, Barbara Palmer, Henry Asante Antwi, C Daniel Mullins

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kayleigh R MajercakSchool of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-4865-2049
Emily F GormanHealth Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas J RobertOntada, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Barbara PalmerThe PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Henry Asante AntwiSchool of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
C Daniel MullinsSchool of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Ontada, LLC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo better understand the SDOH-health equity landscape within a community oncology setting to answer the research question, "Which SDOH can have the highest impact in community oncology to advance patient care equity and improve health outcomes?"

methodsArksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework was used to identify evidence related to SDOH and health equity in community oncology. The study was guided by the "10-Step Framework for Continuous Patient Engagement" and a Community Advisory Board to assure relevance to patients and community providers. Literature was retrieved from literary databases and oncology organizations' websites. Eligible studies included discussion of SDOH and health equity as outlined by the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, respectively, and involved community oncology/cancer care in outpatient settings. Studies were excluded if the SDOH-health equity relationship was not discussed.

resultsThe review resulted in 61 exploratory and 17 confirmatory "intervention" studies addressing the impact of SDOH on health equity in community oncology settings. The most frequently SDOH-health equity pairs identified were the SDOH categories, social inclusion and non-discrimination, income and social protection, and structural conflict, all paired with the health equity category, access to care/treatment. Confirmatory studies focused on income and social protection (SDOH) and access to care/treatment (health equity); the SDOH categories, social inclusion and non-discrimination and health/general literacy-patient, paired with the health equity category, and adherence/compliance.

conclusionsLiterature highlights the SDOH and health equity relationship within the realm of oncology. Most studies on SDOH/health inequities in the community oncology setting are exploratory. There is the need to shift from documentation of cancer inequities to implementing solutions.

Indexed as

Health EquityMedical OncologyNeoplasmsSocial Determinants of HealthCommunity Health ServicesHealthcare DisparitiesHumanscancercommunity oncologyhealthcare outcomeshealth disparitieshealth equityintersectionalitysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39240161
PMCPMC11378356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.