Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39240079›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Nanopore-based targeted sequencing test for direct tuberculosis identification, genotyping, and detection of drug resistance mutations: a side-by-side comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing technologies.

Andrea Maurizio Cabibbe, Kiarash Moghaddasi, Virginia Batignani, Godstime Stephen Kojo Morgan, Federico Di Marco, Daniela Maria Cirillo

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. We Are Underprepared for Bedaquiline Resistance: A Call for Clinical and Programmatic Readiness.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Direct nanopore sequencing ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea Maurizio Cabibbe *Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-6465
Kiarash Moghaddasi *Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-0144-0759
Virginia BatignaniEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Godstime Stephen Kojo MorganEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Federico Di MarcoEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0376-1342
Daniela Maria CirilloEmerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6415-1535

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the performance of the targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS)-based Oxford Nanopore Diagnostics AmPORE TB assay, recently approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) as tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic test for the detection of drug resistance on respiratory specimens. A total of 104 DNA samples from Xpert MTB/RIF-positive TB sputum specimens were tested using the AmPORE TB kit, with the GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB as a comparative tNGS assay. For AmPORE TB, DNA samples were divided into five sequencing runs on the MinION device. Data analysis was performed using proprietary software. The WHO catalog of mutations was used for drug resistance interpretation. The assay achieved a high validity rate of 98% (102/104 DNA samples), homogeneous mean reads coverage across TB-positive specimens, and 100% positive and negative agreements for detecting mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin, pyrazinamide, fluoroquinolones, ethambutol, and capreomycin compared with Deeplex Myc-TB. The main discrepancies for the remaining drugs were attributable to the different assay panel designs. The AmPORE TB turnaround time was approximately 5-6 hours from extracted DNA to tNGS reporting for batches of 22 DNA samples. The AmPORE TB assay drastically reduced the time to tNGS reporting from days to hours and showed good performance for drug-resistant TB profiling compared with Deeplex Myc-TB. IMPORTANCE: Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) of

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisNanoporesAntitubercular AgentsDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNanopore SequencingSputumTuberculosisTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsDNA, Bacterialdrug-resistant tuberculosisrapid tuberculosis laboratory diagnosisrespiratory samplestargeted next-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39240079
PMCPMC11481573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.