Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39239730›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2024

Worrying increase in the risk of vertical transmission of syphilis in Croatia, 2020 to 2024.

Tatjana Nemeth Blažić, Nina Krajcar, Mirjana Lana Kosanović Ličina, Dominik Ljubas, Otilia Mardh, Ivana Božičević

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Increase in congenital syphilis in the European Union and European Economic Area, 2015 to 2024 - time to scale-up public health responses.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tatjana Nemeth BlažićCroatian Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nina KrajcarUniversity Hospital for Infectious Diseases 'Dr Fran Mihaljević', Zagreb, Croatia.
Mirjana Lana Kosanović LičinaAndrija Štampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dominik LjubasUniversity Hospital for Infectious Diseases 'Dr Fran Mihaljević', Zagreb, Croatia.
Otilia MardhEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Ivana BožičevićWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for HIV Strategic Information, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four infants potentially exposed to syphilis infection in utero, meeting World Health Organization surveillance criteria of congenital syphilis (CS), were diagnosed in Croatia between September 2020 and January 2024. We conducted a retrospective analysis of epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data of these cases to assess compliance with surveillance case definitions. As only one confirmed CS case has been reported in Croatia in over 2 decades, these reports signal an increased risk of syphilis vertical transmission and warrant strengthening antenatal screening.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilis, CongenitalAdultCroatiaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesSyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumcongenital syphilisCroatiaepidemiological surveillancepregnancyvertical transmission

Identifiers

PMID39239730
PMCPMC11378514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.