ArticleInterventional pain medicine2024
Effectiveness comparison of genicular nerve ablation for knee osteoarthritic versus post-total knee arthroplasty pain.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Safety.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
- Percutaneous denervation for the treatment of knee pain.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Intraoperative Genicular Nerve Infiltration Offers Comparable Pain Control to Traditional Periarticular Injection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Increasing Denials of Genicular Nerve Procedures Threaten Post-TKA Pain Management and May Drive Opioid Utilization.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Comprehensive genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for refractory knee pain using a dual-tined electrode: A technical description and cross-sectional cohort study.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Patient reported outcomes following genicular nerve radio frequency ablation for osteoarthritis-related knee pain.Pain management · 2025Article
- Chronic Post-Surgical Pain After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Update on Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Interventional Treatment Modalities.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is a popular and effective procedure to treat arthritic knee pain. For refractory arthritic pain that fails conservative treatment, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been an excellent option. Unfortunately, 15-30% of people who undergo a TKA continue to experience pain and stiffness in the knee. The treatment options for post-TKA knee pain are limited. Pain providers have been trialing GNRFA on this pain condition. However, convincing evidence of its efficacy in treating post-TKA pain is still lacking. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 73 patients who had undergone genicular nerve RFA, 46 (63.01%) with osteoarthritic pain, and 27 (36.99%) with post-TKA pain. We compared the outcomes (pain relief, function, and complications) between these two groups at 3 months and 6 months after RFA. Results: Before RFA, there was no significant difference in initial pain and functional level between these two groups. After RFA, the two groups had comparable pain relief at 3 months (p = 0.68) and 6 months (p = 0.53), and similar functionality at 3 months (p = 0.36) and 6 months (p = 0.65).The overall success rate (≥50% pain relief after RFA) was 80.82%, 95% CI: 70.34%-88.22% (osteoarthritic group 80.43%, 95% CI: 66.83%-89.35%, post-TKA 81.48%, 95% CI: 63.30%-91.82%, P = 0.91) at 3-month follow-up and 56.16%, 95% CI: 44.76%-66.95% (osteoarthritic group 56.52%, 95% CI: 42.25%-69.79%, post-TKA 55.56%, 95% CI: 37.31%-72.41%, P = 0.94) at 6-month follow-up.There were no reported complications in either group. Conclusions: Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation (GNRFA) holds the potential to be equally effective for both post-TKA knee pain and osteoarthritic knee pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.