ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024
End-to-end Deep Learning Restoration of GLCM Features from blurred and noisy images.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Generative Model of Lung CT Conditioned on Radiomics Features.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Precision diagnosis of burn injuries using imaging and predictive modeling for clinical applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiomics involves the quantitative analysis of medical images to provide useful information for a range of clinical applications including disease diagnosis, treatment assessment, etc. However, the generalizability of radiomics model is often challenged by undesirable variability in radiomics feature values introduced by different scanners and imaging conditions. To address this issue, we developed a novel dual-domain deep learning algorithm to recover ground truth feature values given known blur and noise in the image. The network consists of two U-Nets connected by a differentiable GLCM estimator. The first U-Net restores the image, and the second restores the GLCM. We evaluated the performance of the network on lung CT image patches in terms of both closeness of recovered feature values to the ground truth and accuracy of classification between normal and COVID lungs. Performance was compared with an image restoration-only method and an analytical method developed in previous work. The proposed network outperforms both methods, achieving GLCM with the lowest mean-absolute-error from ground truth. Recovered GLCM feature values from the proposed method, on average, is within 2.19% error to the ground truth. Classification performance using recovered features from the network closely matches the "best case" performance achieved using ground truth feature values. The deep learning method has been shown to be a promising tool for radiomics standardization, paving the way for more reliable and repeatable radiomics models.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.