ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024
Comparative Analysis of Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Outcomes of Urothelial Bladder Cancer Between Young and Older Adults-Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evidence on bladder cancer in the young population remains fragmented due to lack of literature and conflicting results from the existing studies. We aim to elucidate such conflicting data and define the clinicopathologic characteristics, management trends, and outcomes of urothelial bladder carcinoma in young adults as compared to their older counterparts. This was a retrospective, single-center study involving patients with primary urothelial bladder cancer who underwent treatment at our center from March 2017 to March 2022. For analysis, patients were stratified into three subgroups based on age: group A, 18-40 years; group B, > 40 years; and group C, > 60 years. Group A with younger patients was compared with groups B and C. A total of 471 eligible patients (422 males and 49 females) were included in the study with a median age of 44 years. Group A had significantly lower recurrence and progression rates as compared to group B (31% vs 57.1%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.