ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Surgical outcomes and risk factors for overall mortality in brain arteriovenous malformations patients: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Occipital Pial AVM Rupture in a Young Adult: Dual Intranidal Aneurysms, Solitary Parasagittal SSS Drainage, and Hematoma-Corridor Microsurgical Cure.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictors of Functional Outcome After Microsurgical Resection of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Management for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: A Study Involving 100 Cases.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenging vascular lesions. Extensive follow-up studies are necessary to refine the therapeutic algorithm, and to improve long-term survival in these patients. The aim of the study was to assess surgical outcomes, and to evaluate overall long-term mortality in patients treated for brain AVMs. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 191 patients with brain AVMs, admitted between 2012 and 2022. Clinical and angiographical particularities have been analyzed, to identify factors that might influence early outcome and overall long-term mortality. Results: Out of 79 patients undergoing surgery, 51 had ruptured AVMs with total resection achieved in 68 cases (86.1%). Deep venous drainage was associated with incomplete resection. Female sex, admission modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 2, and eloquent location were independent predictors of poor outcomes. Multiple venous drainage was associated with a higher risk of worsened early outcome. Eloquent brain region involvement, conservative treatment, increasing age, admission mRS > 2, and comorbidities significantly decrease survival in brain AVM patients. Patients treated with interventional treatments had significantly better survival than the conservatively managed ones, when adjusting for age and admission mRS. Conclusion: The study identified female sex, poor neurologic status on admission and eloquence as independent prognostic factors for a negative outcome after surgery. Patients who received interventional treatment had significantly better survival than patients managed conservatively. We recommend employing tailored, proactive management strategies as they significantly enhance long-term survival in brain AVM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.