Multi-physics simulations and experimental comparisons for the optical and electrical forces acting on a silica nanoparticle trapped by a double-nanohole plasmonic nanopore sensor.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Heterogeneous Multilayer Nanopores via Chemically Tuned Dielectric Breakdown for Single-Molecule Sensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
   Article
2. Plasmonic biosensors and actuators for integrated point-of-care diagnostics.Npj biosensing · 2025
   Review
3. Computational and experimental study of AC measurements performed by a double-nanohole plasmonic nanopore sensor on 20 nm silica nanoparticles.Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2024
   Article
4. Multi-physics simulations and experimental comparisons for the optical and electrical forces acting on a silica nanoparticle trapped by a double-nanohole plasmonic nanopore sensor.Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as