Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39239218›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2023

Efficacy of stepped care treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain patients with Modic I and II changes.

Heidi Mylenbusch, Michiel Schepers, Elmar Kleinjan, Marije Pol, Henk Tempelman, Hanneke Klopper-Kes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heidi MylenbuschStichting Rugpoli Twente, Veluwe, Brabant, Randstad - Multidisciplinary Center for Spine and Musculoskeletal Disorders, the Netherlands.
Michiel SchepersStichting Rugpoli Twente, Veluwe, Brabant, Randstad - Multidisciplinary Center for Spine and Musculoskeletal Disorders, the Netherlands.
Elmar KleinjanStichting Rugpoli Twente, Veluwe, Brabant, Randstad - Multidisciplinary Center for Spine and Musculoskeletal Disorders, the Netherlands.
Marije PolStichting Rugpoli Twente, Veluwe, Brabant, Randstad - Multidisciplinary Center for Spine and Musculoskeletal Disorders, the Netherlands.
Henk TempelmanStichting Rugpoli Twente, Veluwe, Brabant, Randstad - Multidisciplinary Center for Spine and Musculoskeletal Disorders, the Netherlands.
Hanneke Klopper-KesStichting Rugpoli Twente, Veluwe, Brabant, Randstad - Multidisciplinary Center for Spine and Musculoskeletal Disorders, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated whether patients with Modic changes (MC) of types I, I/II, and II would respond to an anti-inflammatory-based, stepped care treatment with three treatment steps: first, oral administration of NSAIDs, 2 × 200 mg celecoxib daily for two weeks; second, an intradiscal steroid injection (ID) with dexamethasone and cefazolin; and third, oral treatment with antibiotics (AB), 3 × 1 g amoxicillin daily for 100 days. Design: This was an observational clinical study based on analyses of categorical data of patient-reported outcome measurements. Subjects: Subjects were consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), diagnosed by assessment of anamnestic signs of inflammation; a pain score ≥6 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); a mechanical assessment; MC I, I/II, or II based on MRI; and lack of response to conservative treatment. Methods: From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, 833 eligible patients were selected for the stepped care treatment. A total of 332 patients completed requested follow-up questionnaires at baseline and 12 months (optional at 3 and 6 months). Primary outcomes were pain (at least 50 % pain relief) and/or a minimum of 40 % improvement in functionality as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were use of pain medication and return to work. Results: At 1 year of follow-up, 179 (53.6 %) of 332 patients reported improvement according to the responder criteria. Of the 138 patients that had received only NSAIDs, 88 (63.8 %) had improved. In addition, 50 (56.8 %) of the 183 patients that had received ID had improved, and 41 (38.7 %) of the 106 patients treated with AB had improved. None of the patients reported complications. 12.0 % of patients using AB stopped preterm due to undesirable side effects. Conclusion: Treatment with a stepped care model for inflammatory pain produced clinically relevant, positive reported outcomes on pain and/or function. Our stepped care model appears to be a useful, safe, and cost-saving treatment option that is easily reproducible. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials and analyses of subgroups, may help to develop a more patient-tailored approach and further avoidance of less-effective treatments and costs.

Indexed as

AntibioticsIntradiscal steroid injectionModic changesNSAIDsStepped care model

Identifiers

PMID39239218
PMCPMC11372892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.