ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024
Serial Trend of Neutrophil CD64, C-reactive Protein, and Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis/Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care ICU.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of machine learning models for 30-day mortality prediction in septic shock.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- C-reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as a Predictive Inflammatory Marker for Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and/or Sepsis in Polytraumatized Patients in ICU.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Optical Bionanosensors for Sepsis Diagnostics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Analysis of the prevalence and risk factors of post-intensive-care syndrome and post-sepsis syndrome in survivors of sepsis.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim and background: Neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is evolving as a prognostic biomarker in sepsis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether serial trend of nCD64, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis/septic shock, as per Sepsis-3 criteria. Materials and methods: This prospective, observational single-center cohort study included 60 adult patients (age ≥18 years) with sepsis. Serial biomarker levels with SOFA score were measured at admission (day 0), on day 4, and on day 8. Results: Of the 60 patients, 42 (70%) had septic shock. Biomarker levels at admission did not differ between patients with sepsis and septic shock. Thirty-seven patients survived and 23 were non-survivors by day 28. There was a significant fall in serial trend of all three biomarkers from admission till day 8 (Friedman Conclusion: Serial trend of biomarkers has prognostic utility. The rise in CD64 from day 0 to day 8 was a good predictor of mortality compared to the trend of other biomarkers. How to cite this article: Patnaik R, Azim A, Singh K, Agarwal V, Mishra P, Poddar B,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.