ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2024
Assessing Point-of-care Ultrasound Knowledge and Utilization among Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Saudi national survey of point -of -care ultrasound training in anesthesiology residency programs.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Awareness of Volume Assessment Among Emergency and Intensive Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to assess the knowledge, perceptions, and utilization of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) among emergency physicians (EPs) in Saudi Arabia. Point-of-care ultrasound has emerged as a valuable tool in emergency medicine, providing real-time diagnostic information at the bedside. Understanding the current state of POCUS integration and the factors influencing its adoption is crucial for optimizing patient care in emergency settings. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted across various hospitals in Saudi Arabia over six months. The study included 100 EPs, encompassing residents and specialists. Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire, exploring demographic factors, POCUS training, equipment availability, and physicians' perceptions. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 28.0, including descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests. Results: The study revealed diverse demographic factors, with a majority of physicians working in regional emergency medical centers. While 84.0% of respondents had used an ultrasound device, varying levels of knowledge about POCUS were observed. Regional disparities and differences in training exposure were evident. The majority expressed positive perceptions of POCUS utility, with 67.0% recognizing its usefulness in primary care health centers. However, 31.0% only partially agreed on its daily practice utility, highlighting potential areas for intervention. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive assessment of POCUS awareness, knowledge, and perceptions among EPs in Saudi Arabia. The findings underscore the need for targeted educational initiatives, resource allocation, and regional considerations to enhance POCUS integration. Addressing perceived barriers and regional variations can contribute to the widespread adoption of POCUS, ultimately optimizing patient care in emergency settings. How to cite this article: Almulhim KN, Alabdulqader RA, Alghamd MK, Alqarni AA, Althikrallah FM, Alarfaj AA. Assessing Point-of-care Ultrasound Knowledge and Utilization among Emergency Physicians in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-sectional Survey. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):769-776.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.