ArticleInterventional pain medicine2022
Criteria for determining if a treatment for pain works.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effectiveness of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation using a three-tined electrode: A real-world cross-sectional cohort study.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Athrodesis of the lateral atlanto-axial joint for the relief of neck pain and cervicogenic headache.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Delphi-Based Expert Consensus Statements for the Management of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Neurotomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome.Pain and therapy · 2023Article
- Response to: "Criteria for determining if a treatment for pain works".Interventional pain medicine · 2022Article
- Reply to the:Letter to the Editor written by Hays and Peipert.Interventional pain medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Claims that a treatment works are hollow unless qualified in terms of: in what respects, by how much, how often, and for how long. Essential co-requisites for improvements in pain are improvements in function, psychological distress, and use of health care. Validated instruments are available for these outcome measures. Mean scores and p-values are not informative. Categorical data are required to reveal by how much a treatment works and how often. In order to provide a full picture, outcomes need to be followed until they plateau. Readers of studies should not rely on what authors claim. Instead, readers should demand comprehensive, transparent data on outcomes so that they can decide for themselves if a treatment works to their satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.