Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39239060›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Necrotizing pancreatitis in an 8-year-old girl: a case report from Nepal.

Saroj Kumar Jha, Pinky Jha, Pearlbiga Karki

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saroj Kumar JhaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gajendra Narayan Singh Hospital, Rajbiraj.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0433-2788
Pinky JhaNepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Pearlbiga KarkiNepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Necrotizing pancreatitis is an uncommon diagnosis in pediatric patients. Early diagnosis is difficult as the presentation varies significantly. However, it should be in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in the pediatric age group. Case presentation: An 8-year-old girl arrived with a 1-day history of vomiting, constipation, and abrupt, increasing epigastric discomfort. She didn't have any noteworthy family or medical background. Upon examination, she seemed to be afebrile but also had discomfort in her stomach and symptoms of dehydration. An enlarged pancreas with necrotizing pancreatitis was seen in the first imaging. She received intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and analgesics as a treatment for her acute severe pancreatitis diagnosis. Since the patient continued to have fever, meropenem was prescribed in place of ceftriaxone at first. After 10 days of uncomplicated hospitalization, she was released from the hospital. Discussion: Once rare, pediatric pancreatitis now affects 3-13 out of every 100 000 people yearly. Although it is uncommon (<1% in children), necrotizing pancreatitis can happen. Its causes are similar to those of acute pancreatitis, involving genetic abnormalities and certain drugs. Abdominal discomfort, fever, vomiting, and nausea are among the symptoms. Imaging methods like contrast-enhanced CT are used in diagnosis. Surgery has given way to less intrusive techniques like catheter drainage as a form of treatment. Surgery is seldom required in pediatric instances, which are often handled conservatively. Conclusion: Childhood necrotizing pancreatitis is uncommon but dangerous; prompt diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential.

Indexed as

case reportlipasenecrotizing pancreatitispain abdomenpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39239060
PMCPMC11374229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.