ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Esophageal chemical burns as a risk factor for esophageal malignancies: in-silico analyses - experimental research.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Report on NUF2-Targeted Therapy for Digestive System Cancers: from Mechanism to Clinical Translation.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Microtubule Minus-End Binding Proteins in Cancer: Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- KIF4A in disease pathogenesis and therapeutics: from molecular mechanisms to clinical translation.Biology direct · 2025Review
- Research progress on NUSAP1 and its role in digestive system neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Esophageal chemical burns often occur through accidental or intentional oral consumption of chemical agents and lead to severe complications such as esophageal stricture, acute perforation, and even death. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a squamous epithelium tumor that lines the normal esophagus. Additionally, adenocarcinomas are tumors located at the interface between the distal esophagus and the proximal gastric and divided into esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric-cardia adenocarcinoma. Various conditions, such as chemical burns, are considered risk factors in the disease's pathogenesis. In the in-silico study, the authors aim to present the relationship between chemical burns and esophageal cancer by analyzing bioinformatics genetic data. Methods: The proper gene set was extracted using the 'GEO' database. The string web tool was utilized to form the gene-interaction network. Gephi and Cytoscape software were applied to achieve network analysis. Results: According to in-silico data, 26 genes, including NCAPH, DLGAP5, CCNB1, KIF11, KIAA0101, CDCA5, BIRC5, NUF2, BUB1B, RRM2, TTK, CDC20, NUSAP1, CCNB2, CCNA2, MELK, TPX2, PRC1, KIF4A, CENPF, TOP2A, CDK1, ASPM, CEP55, BUB1, KIF20A were extracted that can be regarded as the most critical shared genes between chemical burns and esophageal cancer. Conclusion: In sum, esophageal chemical burns can be related to the occurrence of esophageal cancer. Moreover, esophageal chemical burn is an external factor that upregulates present genes and can be regarded as a worsening prognosis or risk factor for esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.