Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39239040›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

Esophageal chemical burns as a risk factor for esophageal malignancies: in-silico analyses - experimental research.

Hengameh Khosravani, Reza Ataee Disfani, Bahar Farhadi, Mobina Tohidian, Lida Garrosi, Proushat Shirvani, Mohammad Reza Zabihi, Mohammad Akhoondian, Narges Norouzkhani, Ramyar Farzan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Microtubule Minus-End Binding Proteins in Cancer: Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hengameh KhosravaniMedicine Group, Amin Entezami University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza Ataee DisfaniStudent Research Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Bahar FarhadiSchool of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran.
Mobina TohidianDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Lida GarrosiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.
Proushat ShirvaniSchool of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mohammad Reza ZabihiDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad AkhoondianDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Narges NorouzkhaniDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ramyar FarzanDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Esophageal chemical burns often occur through accidental or intentional oral consumption of chemical agents and lead to severe complications such as esophageal stricture, acute perforation, and even death. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is a squamous epithelium tumor that lines the normal esophagus. Additionally, adenocarcinomas are tumors located at the interface between the distal esophagus and the proximal gastric and divided into esophageal adenocarcinoma and gastric-cardia adenocarcinoma. Various conditions, such as chemical burns, are considered risk factors in the disease's pathogenesis. In the in-silico study, the authors aim to present the relationship between chemical burns and esophageal cancer by analyzing bioinformatics genetic data. Methods: The proper gene set was extracted using the 'GEO' database. The string web tool was utilized to form the gene-interaction network. Gephi and Cytoscape software were applied to achieve network analysis. Results: According to in-silico data, 26 genes, including NCAPH, DLGAP5, CCNB1, KIF11, KIAA0101, CDCA5, BIRC5, NUF2, BUB1B, RRM2, TTK, CDC20, NUSAP1, CCNB2, CCNA2, MELK, TPX2, PRC1, KIF4A, CENPF, TOP2A, CDK1, ASPM, CEP55, BUB1, KIF20A were extracted that can be regarded as the most critical shared genes between chemical burns and esophageal cancer. Conclusion: In sum, esophageal chemical burns can be related to the occurrence of esophageal cancer. Moreover, esophageal chemical burn is an external factor that upregulates present genes and can be regarded as a worsening prognosis or risk factor for esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

burnscancerchemical burnsesophageal canceresophageal malignancies

Identifiers

PMID39239040
PMCPMC11374246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.