ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Assessment of predictive value of thyromental height in predicting difficult laryngoscopy compared with Mallampati, and thyromental distance among surgical patient who will take general anesthesia at selected governmental hospital cross-sectional study: Ethiopia, 2022.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of the Accuracy of Thyromental Height Test for Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy in Obstetric Patients Who Are Candidates for Cesarean Section: An Observational Study.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2025Article
- Radiological indicators and a novel combined predictive model for anticipating difficult laryngoscopy in cervical spondylosis patients: a prospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anesthesiologists must always perform a preoperative airway examination to identify individuals who will have challenging laryngoscopy. In an effort to identify the most accurate airway predictor, numerous authors have evaluated a number of predictive assays. Thyromental height test (TMHT), a new airway predictor, has recently been demonstrated to have good predictive value in determining difficult airways. This study's main objective was to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the TMHT and compare it to other known airway predictors, such as the modified Mallampati test (MMT) and the thyromental distance (TMD). Objective: To assess the predictive value of TMHT in predicting difficult laryngoscopy compared to modified MMT and TMD among patients who will take general anesthesia. Method: In this prospective, observational study, which took place from March 2021 to May 2021, 247 people of either sex who were older than 18 but not more than 65 and scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia participated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to identify the proper cut-off values for TMHT, and the Fisher exact test was used to calculate the correlation. Result: Incidence of Difficult laryngoscopy was 13.4%. For TMHT the cut-off values were 4.9 cm and it had a sensitivity of 78.8%, a specificity of 89.7%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 54.2%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.5%, respectively. When compared to other parameters, like TMD, and MMT. TMHT had the highest sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. ( Conclusion and recommendation: Of all the airway assessments, the TMHT had the highest accuracy and odds ratio for predicting difficult laryngoscopy with the highest odds ratio and accuracy. TMHT has to be validated in broader patient groups because it appears to be a possible single anatomical marker for predicting the likelihood of a difficult laryngoscopy. It needs more research because it isn't assessed in pediatrics and pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.