ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Visualizing thyroid health: a pictorial journey through 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid pathologies.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS), more thyroid nodules are being detected than ever before, and they are being identified at an earlier stage. It poses a challenge for radiologists and clinicians in deciding what to do next. Most nodules are benign and require no follow-up and intervention. Even highly suspicious nodules can be followed up, if the size is small. Variations in HRUS interpretation among radiologists are common, with frequent misidentifications between spongiform and solid-cystic lesions, hypoechoic and very hypoechoic nodules, and microcalcification and hyperechoic foci with comet-tail artifacts. Cystic lesions with echogenic contents are often confused with solid nodules, cystic papillary carcinoma thyroid is often confused with colloid cysts. The 2017 ACR TI-RADS (American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) aims to standardize the interpretation of thyroid nodules and guide further management. Rather than giving specific diagnosis like colloid cyst, adenomatous nodule and papillary carcinoma; ACR TI-RADS classifies nodules from TI-RADS 1 to TI-RADS 5 based on HRUS characteristics and recommends further management. What the authors often read are textual contents that are theoretical, and in practice, the authors get confused while interpreting the characteristics of thyroid nodules. This review offers a detailed visual overview of the 2017 ACR TI-RADS and common thyroid conditions, explaining key features through imaging data and examples for consistent interpretation. Combining textual explanations with visual aids, this article provides practical guidance for interpreting thyroid nodules for radiologists, and clinicians seeking a clear understanding of thyroid imaging and pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.