Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39239014›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

A comparative study on effects of defect closure versus non-closure in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of direct inguinal hernia.

Vijay Pratap Sah, Bikash Kumar Sah, Nishant Sah, Bhawani Khanal, Abhijeet Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vijay Pratap SahDepartment of Surgery, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Bikash Kumar SahDepartment of Surgery, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Nishant SahDepartment of Surgery, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Bhawani KhanalDepartment of Surgery, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Abhijeet KumarDepartment of Surgery, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.
Rakesh Kumar GuptaDepartment of Surgery, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS), Dharan, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair are the principal techniques in laparoscopic hernia repair. Seroma formation and pain are frequent complications of moderate-large size laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia mesh repair. This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of defect closure in moderate-large direct inguinal hernias and its effect on various outcomes. Method: This is a prospective cohort study from September 2020 to August 2021, where a total of 88 patients with uncomplicated direct inguinal hernia (M3 or more) were enrolled in the study and divided into two equal groups of TEP defect closure and non-closure, and various outcome measures were noted. Results: The majority of patients were male (94.31%), with a mean age range of 18-85 years, and had right-sided inguinal hernia (46.5%). Seroma formation at 10th POD in the defect closure and non-closure were 24% and 33% ( Conclusion: The defect closure was found to have higher pain and less seroma formation at various intervals of time following TEP for moderate-large direct inguinal hernia. Although these findings were statistically insignificant, they may be clinically significant, and further studies with a larger sample size are suggested.

Indexed as

defect closureinguinal herniapainseroma formationTEPtotally extraperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID39239014
PMCPMC11374157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.