Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238962›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024

The efficacy of virtual reality-based rehabilitation in improving motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Priyadarshi Prajjwal, Kiran Kishor Chandrasekar, Pavani Battula, Elizabeth Gaviria, Mishael Oluwadamilola Awe, Pugazhendi Inban, Adel S Almutairi, Arpan Das, Yogesh Tekuru, Mohammed Dheyaa Marsool Marsool and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Priyadarshi PrajjwalDepartment of Neurology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune.
Kiran Kishor ChandrasekarNeurology, Clinical Development Fellow, University Hospital Ayr, Ayr, Scotland, UK.
Pavani BattulaDepartment of Neurology, NTR University of Health Sciences, Hyderabad.
Elizabeth GaviriaCES University, Medellin, Colombia.
Mishael Oluwadamilola AweFederal Teaching Hospital, Lokoja, Nigeria.
Pugazhendi InbanSt. Mary's General Hospital and St. Clare's Health.
Adel S AlmutairiCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Arpan DasDepartment of Neurology, RG Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata.
Yogesh TekuruDepartment of Neurology, RVM Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Laxmakkapally.
Mohammed Dheyaa Marsool MarsoolUniversity of Baghdad, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq.
Murali Mohan ReddyDepartment of Neurology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore.
Spandana MitraTata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur.
Hyma BambaInternal Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh.
Gurmehar SinghInternal Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh.
Hritvik JainInternal Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, India.
Srikanth GadamNYC Health+ hospitals, New York, NY, USA.
Omniat Amir HussinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Al-Manhal Academy, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a major cause of adult disability, prompting the exploration of innovative rehabilitation methods. Virtual rehabilitation (VR), leveraging technological advances, has gained popularity as a treatment for stroke recovery. Methodology: The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English within the last decade, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. The authors searched databases such as Medline/PubMed, and the Cochrane Library using specific search keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale, focusing on RCTs involving adult stroke patients undergoing VR rehabilitation, with outcomes related to motor function and quality of life. Results: The authors included 15 studies in our meta-analysis. VR rehabilitation offers several advantages over traditional therapy, such as enhanced feedback and increased patient motivation. Engaging VR environments helps improve focus during treatment, potentially boosting recovery from post-stroke impairments. VR therapies significantly benefit motor function, which can improve activities of daily living and overall quality of life. Conclusion: VR has demonstrated efficacy in improving motor function and quality of life for stroke survivors. Future research should explore patient variability and refine intervention methods. Incorporating VR into rehabilitation programs could optimize stroke recovery outcomes.

Indexed as

exposure therapymotor functionphysical therapystrokevirtual rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39238962
PMCPMC11374195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.