ArticleJCEM case reports2024
Diagnosing Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Pregnancy: A Case of Altered Parathyroid Hormone Degradation in Pregnancy.
Article in JCEM case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing primary hyperparathyroidism in pregnancy is difficult due to pregnancy-related changes in parathyroid hormone (PTH); calcium; 1,25 vitamin D; and renal calcium excretion. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) produced by the placenta adds additional complexity. Our case is the first to demonstrate an increased rate of PTH degradation within a pregnant individual who returned unexpectedly low PTH levels. We describe a 27-year-old female patient who presented at 25 weeks gestation with pancreatitis and hypercalcemia. Primary hyperparathyroidism was suspected but variable PTH results led to uncertainty and an assay error was considered. PTH samples were collected in both serum-separating tubes (SST) and EDTA tubes and compared to controls (5 nonpregnant and 5 pregnant individuals). Samples were retested every 2 hours for a period of 10 hours. A rapid decline in the measured PTH was noted in the index case, an observation which differed from controls. We postulated that internal and/or external factors influenced the PTH measurement obtained from our patient. From our observations, rapid PTH degradation in pregnancy, and individual variation in PTH stability and laboratory processes, can influence PTH results and impact on interpreting hypercalcemia in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.