Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238906›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2023

The therapeutic effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided intra-articular sacroiliac joint injections in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, an observational study.

Tyler J Kristoff, Jacob T Sinopoli, Tyler Farley, Nicholas Rabah, Nicolas R Thompson, Kush Goyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tyler J KristoffJ. Willis Hurst Internal Medicine Residency Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.
Jacob T SinopoliCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Health Education Campus, 9501 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States.
Tyler FarleyDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, United States.
Nicholas RabahCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Health Education Campus, 9501 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, United States.
Nicolas R ThompsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, United States.
Kush GoyalCenter for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 4195, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this project is to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided intra-articular sacroiliac (SI) joint injections in patients with diagnosed SI joint dysfunction. Patient reported outcomes related to pain and quality of life measures were evaluated. Design: This is a retrospective observational study of patients receiving intra-articular SI joint injections under a single provider at the Cleveland Clinic from September 2013 to April 2019. Three hundred fifty-one patients received injections and were administered patient reported outcomes (PROs) including the Numeric Rating Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Pain Disability Questionnaire, EuroQol-5 Dimensions Questionnaire, and PROMIS-GH Physical and Mental Health at baseline and approximately 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month time points during follow-up appointments. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients receiving their first injection who achieved minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in these PROs at each follow-up time point. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving MCID in each PRO for each injection analyzed (including patients who received repeat injections) and average change in these PROs at each time point for first and all injections. Results: A total of 351 patients were included in the analysis, with varying time points of follow-up. The average patient age was 52.3 (±14.9) years with 74.9% female and 59.0% white. For first time injections, the MCID was achieved for Numeric Rating Scale in 60.6%, 42.1%, 47.5%, and 32.5% of patients at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, respectively. There was significant improvement in PROMIS-GH Physical Health at 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. There was no significant improvement in PROMIS-GH Mental Health at any follow-up time points. Conclusions: Fluoroscopically guided intra-articular SI joint injection for SI joint dysfunction is effective in providing therapeutic pain relief exceeding MCID values in greater than 60% of patients at 1 month and greater than 40% at 3- and 6- months after injection. However, while this intervention may provide significant pain relief and improvement in function, it may not address the psychosocial aspect of chronic pain to the same extent.

Indexed as

Sacroiliac joint dysfunctionSacro-iliac joint ligamentous complexSacroiliitisSI joint injectionsSI joint pain

Identifiers

PMID39238906
PMCPMC11373076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.