Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238903›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2023

Real-world outcomes of single-stage spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients: A multicentre, European case series.

Pasquale De Negri, Jose Francisco Paz-Solis, Philippe Rigoard, Sylvie Raoul, Jan-Willem Kallewaard, Ashish Gulve, Simon Thomson, Maria Angeles Canós-Verdecho, Sarah Love-Jones, Adam Williams and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Pasquale De NegriDepartment of Anesthesia, Sant'Anna and San Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy.
Jose Francisco Paz-SolisDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Philippe RigoardPredictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery Lab, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Sylvie RaoulDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Jan-Willem KallewaardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Ashish GulveDepartment of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Simon ThomsonDepartment of Pain Medicine and Neuromodulation, Mid and South Essex University Hospitals, Essex, UK.
Maria Angeles Canós-VerdechoMultidisciplinary Unit for Pain Treatment, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Sarah Love-JonesMultidisciplinary Unit for Pain Treatment, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Adam WilliamsDepartment of Pain Medicine and Neuromodulation, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Fernando J Rascón-RamírezNeurosurgery Service, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Simon BayerlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
José Emilio Llopis-CalatayudService of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Therapeutics of Pain, University Hospital La Ribera, Alzira, Valencia, Spain.
Isaac Peña VergaraAndalusian Health Service, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Georgios K MatisDepartment of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jan VesperDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
David AbejónMultidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, University Hospital Quirónsalud, Madrid, Spain.
Paolo MainoNeurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano Regional Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland.
Alfonso PapaPain Department, A.O. Dei Colli - V. Monaldi Hospital, Napoli, Italy.
Yu PeiDivision of Neuromodulation, Boston Scientific, Valencia, CA, USA.
Roshini JainDivision of Neuromodulation, Boston Scientific, Valencia, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. A screening trial is typically conducted prior to implantation to evaluate whether a patient is a good candidate for SCS. However, the need for a screening trial has been debated. We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes in patients who underwent a single-stage procedure to receive SCS therapy (i.e., no screening trial period) (SS-SCS). Methods: This observational, multicentre, real-world consecutive case series evaluated SS-SCS chronic pain patients. Pain and other functional outcomes were collected as part of standard care by site personnel with no sponsor involvement. Assessments included Numerical rating scale (NRS), Percent Pain Relief (PPR) and EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5L), recorded prior to SCS and following implantation. Results: A total of 171 chronic pain patients (mean age: 59.4; 53.2% females) underwent a single-stage procedure (mean last follow-up, 408 days) and were included in the analysis. A 5.0 ​± ​2.1-point improvement in overall pain was reported at 3 months and sustained until the last follow-up post-implantation (p ​< ​0.0001). At last follow-up, 50.3% (86/171) of patients reported an NRS pain score ≤3. Additionally, quality of life also improved (46.1-point change, from 70.2 to 25) at the last follow-up, based on EQ-5D-5L scores. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, SS-SCS can provide significant long-term pain relief and improve quality of life in chronic pain patients. Our results suggest that effective long-term outcomes and success may be achieved without a trial period prior to permanent implantation of an SCS system.

Indexed as

Chronic painNeuromodulationSingle-stage procedureSpinal cord stimulationTrial screening

Identifiers

PMID39238903
PMCPMC11372901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.