ReviewJB & JS open access
Robots on the Stage: A Snapshot of the American Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Market.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iatrogenic coronal-sagittal coupling driven by a 12.4° rotational mismatch in manual total knee arthroplasty and precise decoupling with robotic assistance: a radiographic retrospective cohort study.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Limited Accuracy of Tibial Stylus Measurements in Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- [Robotics in knee arthroplasty : Current status and developments].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- 2050: An Arthroplasty Odyssey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparing Tourniquet Use and Non-Use in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasties.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the USA: Nationwide adoption trends towards 70 % by 2030.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Imageless Robotic Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Workflow Optimization, Operative Times, and Learning Curve.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
» Computer-assisted robots aid orthopaedic surgeons in implant positioning and bony resection. Surgeons selecting a robot for their practice are faced with numerous options. This study aims to make the choice less daunting by reviewing the most commonly used Food and Drug Administration-approved robotic total knee arthroplasty platforms in the American arthroplasty market.» Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) robots use computer guidance to create a virtual knee model that serves as the surgeon's canvas for resection planning.» Most available robotic TKA (rTKA) systems are closed semiactive systems that restrict implant use to those of the manufacturer.» Each system has distinct imaging requirements, safety features, resection methods, and operating room footprints that will affect a surgeon's technique and practice.» Robots carry different purchase, maintenance, and equipment costs that will influence patient access across different socioeconomic groups.» Some studies show improved early patient-reported outcomes with rTKA, but long-term studies have yet to show clinical superiority over manual TKA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.