ArticleInterventional pain medicine2022
Bone marrow aspirate injection for osteoarthritis of the hip; A pilot study.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate to Treat Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Review of Progress and Challenges.Cartilage · 2025Article
- Article
- Intra-Articular Administration of PBHSCs CD34+ as an Effective Modality of Treatment and Improving the Quality of Life in Patients with Coxarthrosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Orthobiologic injections for hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review of clinical outcomes.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- Innovative Approaches in Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Bone Marrow-Derived Products.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Bone-Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) intra-articular injection is a minimally invasive orthobiologic treatment option for osteoarthritis (OA). Hip OA affects a significant portion of the population and has a paucity of data surrounding orthobiologic treatments. The primary objective of this study was to delineate the clinical impact of bone marrow aspirate intra-articular injections on decreasing pain and improving function in patients with hip OA. Methods: A single-center, retrospective analysis of thirty-one patients, aged 32 to 83 (62.4 ± 16.5), with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Hip OA grading of 2-4 (mean 2.9 ± 0.7), who underwent intra-articular bone marrow aspirate injection into the hip and were followed for twelve months. Evaluation was at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr (HOOS-Jr) for function. The proportion of responders, as defined by a ≥50% reduction in NRS pain score, was assessed at 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. Results: At 6 and 12 months follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in NRS scores (P < 0.05). Stratifying by KL grade, subjects with KL grades 2 and 3 experienced statistically significant improvement in NRS scores at 6 and 12 months. Patients with KL grade 4 showed significant improvement in pain at 12 months. Forty-two percent of patients at 6 months and 61% at 12 months reported ≥50% reduction in pain. When stratifying by KL grade, 80% and 71% of KL2 and KL3 grades respectively were responders by 12 months. Patients experienced statistically significant improvement in HOOS-Jr scores at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion: In patient with mild, moderate, and severe hip OA, BMA may be an alternative treatment that improves pain and function in patients for as long as 12 months. In addition, BMA may also be an effective, lower cost option to more expensive BMAC preparations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.