Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238857›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2022

Cervical spinal cord stimulator trial complicated by epidural abscess.

Rana Al-Jumah, Jatinder Gill, Thomas Simopoulos

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rana Al-JumahDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Jatinder GillDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Thomas SimopoulosDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center-Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Back ground: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a growing interventional treatment modality in patients experiencing intractable pain refractory to conservative treatments. Many patients with chronic low back and leg pain that persists after surgery have found pain relief, and more evidence is suggesting that chronic upper limb and neck pain may respond just as well to this therapy. However, the placement of foreign body, for instance SCS leads, in the epidural space can become the source for deep intra-spinal infection. Case report: We present a 49-year-old robust male who underwent a temporary cervical SCS trial and was diagnosed with epidural abscess on the day 9 when the leads were pulled. The trial phase was complicated by immediate and prolonged post procedure pain. The diagnosis of epidural abscess was made soon after clinical presentation with no neurological deficits or escalation in pain but new onset fever. He made a complete recovery after extensive laminectomy and antibiotic treatment. Conclusion: The decision to extend the SCS trial length poses a question of risk versus benefit in regards to potential infectious complications versus pain relief. Continuing antibiotic therapy during a SCS trial phase is a possible strategy but of uncertain benefit. Categories: Anesthesiology, Pain Management.

Indexed as

Chronic neck painEpidural abscessFailed neck surgery syndromeSpinal cord stimulator trial

Identifiers

PMID39238857
PMCPMC11373036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.