Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238856›Full record

ReviewInterventional pain medicine2022

The impact of spinal cord stimulation on opioid utilization in failed back surgery syndrome and spinal surgery naïve patients.

Adam Rupp, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Timothy Deer, Dawood Sayed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam RuppDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Vinicius Tieppo FrancioDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Jonathan M HagedorniSpine Pain Physicians, Maple Grove, MN, USA.
Timothy DeerThe Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
Dawood SayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been utilized for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with well-documented improvements in pain and function. However, limited studies have investigated the relationship between spinal surgery, SCS and opioid use outcomes. Methods: A narrative review utilizing the scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) methodology looking at trials involving SCS and opiates. Results: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Surgery-naïve subjects had the greatest mean opioid dose reduction of 50.39% morphine milliequivalents, and the greatest number of patients who discontinued opioids at 53.72%. No statistical analysis was performed due to heterogeneous data. Conclusion: SCS has a positive impact on opioid reduction, regardless of prior spinal surgical history. However, due to a lack of homogenous data, a formal conclusion comparing outcomes between spinal surgical histories cannot be drawn. There is an inherent difficulty in evaluating this topic given its complexity and multifactorial origin. Studies would require collaboration between pain physicians, societies and industry. Even then, patient biases such as psychological and expectation would be difficult to account for. This topic remains an ongoing challenge for interventional pain physicians.

Indexed as

Failed back surgery syndromeLow back painNeuromodulationOpioid abuseOpioid therapySpinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39238856
PMCPMC11372956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.