ArticleInterventional pain medicine2022
Patient and provider radiation exposure during fluoroscopy guided chemical and thermal neurolysis of genicular nerves: A prospective cohort comparison study.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the differences in radiation dosimetry, fluoroscopy time and procedure time between fluoroscopy-guided chemical and thermal genicular neurolysis techniques. Methods: This single-site, open label observational cohort was done at an urban, tertiary medical center pain clinic. Board certified pain medicine physicians with at least 5 years of experience with genicular neurolysis procedures performed or supervised all interventions. Clinical characteristics and procedural details were collected at each procedure. Patients underwent chemical neurolysis using phenol or cooled radiofrequency neurolysis. Radiation dosimetry was the primary outcome and was compared between the between chemical and radiofrequency neurolysis groups. Results: Thirty-one subjects (15 had chemical and 16 had radiofrequency neurolysis procedures) underwent a total of 43 interventions. Twelve underwent bilateral procedures. Radiation dosimetry per procedure was 1.66 (0.89 to 2.45) Gy-cm Conclusions: We found that patient radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and interventionalist radiation exposure were not different between chemical and radiofrequency neurolysis. Genicular neurolysis was more rapidly performed using chemical as compared to radiofrequency neurolysis. BMI and Kellgren-Lawrence grade, but not procedural factors were associated with greater absorbed radiation doses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.