Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238851›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

Outcomes for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Admitted to Medical vs Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

Andi Shahu, Sathvik Namburar, Soumya Banna, Alyssa Harris, Christopher Schenck, Camila Trejo-Paredes, Alexander Thomas, Tariq Ali, Anthony P Carnicelli, Christopher F Barnett and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andi ShahuSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Sathvik NamburarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Soumya BannaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Alyssa HarrisCenter for Advanced Analytics and Informatics, Vizient, Inc, Irving, Texas, USA.
Christopher SchenckDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Camila Trejo-ParedesSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Alexander ThomasSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Tariq AliSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Anthony P CarnicelliDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Christopher F BarnettDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael A SolomonCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
P Elliott MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a common reason for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there is limited data comparing outcomes for patients with AMI admitted to specific ICUs. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes between patients with AMI requiring invasive mechanical ventilation admitted to the medical ICU (MICU) compared to cardiac (CICU). Methods: We utilized the Vizient Clinical Data Base to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of AMI between October 2015 and December 2019 and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Using multivariable logistic regression, we compared clinical outcomes for patients admitted to the MICU vs CICU. Results: We identified 12,639 patients, 25.2% (n = 3,185) of which were admitted to a MICU and 74.8% (n = 9,454) to a CICU. Patients admitted to a CICU were more likely to present with STEMI (57.0% vs 42.8%), cardiogenic shock (46.0% vs 37.4%), and require mechanical circulatory support and vasoactive medications (all, Conclusions: Admission to the CICU, as compared to MICU, was associated with lower in-hospital mortality for patients with AMI. These findings may support optimal triage of critically ill patients with AMI.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionintensive care unitinvasive mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID39238851
PMCPMC11375252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.