ArticleJACC. Advances2024
IMPACT-FH Study for Implementing Innovative Family Communication and Cascade Testing Strategies for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Cardiovascular Genetic Epidemiology in the Genome-Wide Era: From Association Discovery to Mechanistic Dissection and Clinical Translation.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Implementing a primary-tertiary shared care model for enhancing cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type III pre-post study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Editorial commentary: From prevalence to practice - implementing familial hypercholesterolemia screening in high-risk clinics using an implementation science framework.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Public attitudes toward cascade genetic screening in the United States.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Digital Educational Strategies to Implement Evidence-Based Care for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Enhancing the detection of familial hypercholesterolaemia in general practice: A model for supporting genetic cascade testing in the community.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Family Leaders Navigate Burden to Communicate Risk during Cascade Screening after Sudden Cardiac Death in the Young.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- The IMPACT-FH Renewal Protocol: Evaluating FH Cascade Testing Implementation in Primary Care through a Pragmatic Trial, Economic Evaluation, and Mixed-Methods Sustainability Assessment.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Implementation strategies for improving the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia from the International Atherosclerosis Society: next steps in implementation science and practice.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Implementation of a Traceback Testing Program for Ovarian Cancer: Findings from the FACTS Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Reporting Modifications from the IMPACT-FH Study Using the FRAME-IS.Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Review
- The Power of the Pedigree: Cascade Screening in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Innovative Implementation Strategies for Familial Hypercholesterolemia Cascade Testing: The Impact of Genetic Counseling.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Utilizing innovative implementation strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia: Implementation outcomes from the IMPACT-FH study.Journal of clinical lipidologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Relatives of probands diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) should undergo cascade testing for FH. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate probands' choices of innovative strategies to communicate their FH result with relatives and facilitate cascade testing uptake. Methods: Probands with an FH genetic result from the MyCode Community Health Initiative could choose to share their FH result with adult blood relatives via the Family and Healthcare Professional Packet (packet), family sharing and cascade chatbots (chatbot), and/or FH Outreach and Support Program (direct contact). Cascade testing uptake was measured as reported completion of genetic or cholesterol testing. Generalized estimating equations models were used to identify factors associated with testing. Results: One hundred seventy five probands received an FH result, median age was 58.9 (IQR: 44.9-69.3), and 58.9% were female. Probands shared information about 1,915 adult and 163 minor relatives (11.9 relatives per proband). Seventy percent of probands (121/175) selected at least one strategy for at least one adult relative. An average of 1.2 strategies was selected per adult relative. Cascade testing was completed for 26.6% (144/541) of adults with at least one strategy selected, 2.4% (33/1,374) of adults without a strategy selected, and 25.2% (41/163) of minor relatives. Factors associated with increased cascade testing uptake were selection of at least one strategy (6.32 higher odds), specifically, selection of direct contact (16.78 higher odds). Conclusions: Strategies implemented improved FH cascade testing uptake compared to previous estimates and in families where no strategy was selected. Overall uptake remains insufficient, which can be attributed to probands reluctance to select a strategy for many relatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.