Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238848›Full record

ArticleJACC. Advances2024

IMPACT-FH Study for Implementing Innovative Family Communication and Cascade Testing Strategies for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Laney K Jones, Gemme Campbell-Salome, Nicole L Walters, Andrew Brangan, Kelly M Morgan, Eric P Tricou, Zoe T Lindsey Mills, Mary P McGowan, Samuel S Gidding, Alicia M Johns and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laney K JonesDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Gemme Campbell-SalomeDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nicole L WaltersDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrew BranganDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kelly M MorganDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eric P TricouFamily Heart Foundation, Pasadena, California, USA.
Zoe T Lindsey MillsDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mary P McGowanFamily Heart Foundation, Pasadena, California, USA.
Samuel S GiddingDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alicia M JohnsBiostatistics Core, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
H Lester KirchnerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alanna Kulchak RahmDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Amy C SturmDepartment of Genomic Health, Research Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Identification Methods, Patient Activation, and Cascade Testing for FH: IMPACT-FHR01HL148246 · NHLBI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI Ana Morales Reyes · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Relatives of probands diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) should undergo cascade testing for FH. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate probands' choices of innovative strategies to communicate their FH result with relatives and facilitate cascade testing uptake. Methods: Probands with an FH genetic result from the MyCode Community Health Initiative could choose to share their FH result with adult blood relatives via the Family and Healthcare Professional Packet (packet), family sharing and cascade chatbots (chatbot), and/or FH Outreach and Support Program (direct contact). Cascade testing uptake was measured as reported completion of genetic or cholesterol testing. Generalized estimating equations models were used to identify factors associated with testing. Results: One hundred seventy five probands received an FH result, median age was 58.9 (IQR: 44.9-69.3), and 58.9% were female. Probands shared information about 1,915 adult and 163 minor relatives (11.9 relatives per proband). Seventy percent of probands (121/175) selected at least one strategy for at least one adult relative. An average of 1.2 strategies was selected per adult relative. Cascade testing was completed for 26.6% (144/541) of adults with at least one strategy selected, 2.4% (33/1,374) of adults without a strategy selected, and 25.2% (41/163) of minor relatives. Factors associated with increased cascade testing uptake were selection of at least one strategy (6.32 higher odds), specifically, selection of direct contact (16.78 higher odds). Conclusions: Strategies implemented improved FH cascade testing uptake compared to previous estimates and in families where no strategy was selected. Overall uptake remains insufficient, which can be attributed to probands reluctance to select a strategy for many relatives.

Indexed as

cascade testingfamilial hypercholesterolemiafamily communicationimplementation strategies

Identifiers

PMID39238848
PMCPMC11375316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.