ReviewInterventional pain medicine2022
The therapeutic effect of genicular nerve radiofrequency for chronic knee pain after a total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.
Review in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Safety.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized pilot trial (COCOGEN trial).Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2023Trial
- Percutaneous denervation for the treatment of knee pain.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Chronic Pain and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive, Phenotype-Based Review of Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Genicular nerves: ultrasound anatomy, scanning techniques, and clinical implications.Journal of ultrasonography · 2026Review
- Outcome and predictors of knee radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain relief: A retrospective cohort study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Evaluating the effectiveness of genicular radiofrequency ablation for chronic knee pain using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global health-physical health domain: Results of a cross-sectional cohort study.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Chronic Post-Surgical Pain After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Update on Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Interventional Treatment Modalities.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey study of the International Pain and Spine Interventional Society.Interventional pain medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Summarize the therapeutic pain-reducing effects of GnRF for refractory post-TKA knee pain. A secondary objective was to summarize improvements in physical function after GnRF. Methods: A protocol was registered, and a database search conducted by an experienced librarian of all available studies in the English language up until November 3, 2021. Study inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies, case series, case reports, studies involving adults ≥18 years of age, and studies written about the use of GnRF for the alleviation of chronic knee pain after receiving a TKA. The study quality and risk of bias was assessed using NHLBI Study Quality of Assessment Tools and Murad et al.'s Quality Assessment of Case Reports. Certainty in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: A total of 229 studies were screened, 11 met the inclusion criteria, and 265 patients underwent GnRF. Study designs included 1 double-blind pragmatic RCT, 5 retrospective cohort studies, 2 retrospective case series, and 3 case reports. The overall study quality assessment demonstrated three studies had "good", six "fair", and two "poor" quality. There have been positive responses to GnRF for post-TKA chronic knee pain in a range of 30-100% of patients. Conclusions: According to GRADE, there is limited evidence, associated with low certainty to support the use of GnRF to ameliorate chronic knee pain after TKA, largely due to inconsistency and risk of bias. The studies included in this review reported positive results in pain and disability, and relatively few adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.