Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238808›Full record

ReviewInterventional pain medicine2022

The therapeutic effect of genicular nerve radiofrequency for chronic knee pain after a total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

James B Meiling, Brandon S Barndt, Christopher T Ha, James E Eubanks, Justin B Schappell, George M Raum, Samir A Khan, Larry Prokop, Aaron Conger, Zachary L McCormick and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James B MeilingDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Brandon S BarndtDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Boyer Ste 226A, 3509 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19410, USA.
Christopher T HaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
James E EubanksDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 1400 Locust St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Justin B SchappellDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
George M RaumDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 1400 Locust St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, USA.
Samir A KhanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Ste 1318, 2201 Childrens Way, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Larry ProkopMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Aaron CongerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Zachary L McCormickDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, 590 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Christine L HuntDepartment of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Summarize the therapeutic pain-reducing effects of GnRF for refractory post-TKA knee pain. A secondary objective was to summarize improvements in physical function after GnRF. Methods: A protocol was registered, and a database search conducted by an experienced librarian of all available studies in the English language up until November 3, 2021. Study inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies, case series, case reports, studies involving adults ≥18 years of age, and studies written about the use of GnRF for the alleviation of chronic knee pain after receiving a TKA. The study quality and risk of bias was assessed using NHLBI Study Quality of Assessment Tools and Murad et al.'s Quality Assessment of Case Reports. Certainty in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: A total of 229 studies were screened, 11 met the inclusion criteria, and 265 patients underwent GnRF. Study designs included 1 double-blind pragmatic RCT, 5 retrospective cohort studies, 2 retrospective case series, and 3 case reports. The overall study quality assessment demonstrated three studies had "good", six "fair", and two "poor" quality. There have been positive responses to GnRF for post-TKA chronic knee pain in a range of 30-100% of patients. Conclusions: According to GRADE, there is limited evidence, associated with low certainty to support the use of GnRF to ameliorate chronic knee pain after TKA, largely due to inconsistency and risk of bias. The studies included in this review reported positive results in pain and disability, and relatively few adverse events.

Indexed as

Chronic knee painGenicular nerveRadiofrequencySystematic reviewTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39238808
PMCPMC11372961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.