Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238754›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluation of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Intestinal Obstruction.

Anuradha Kelkar, Vishav Bir S Thakur, Jacob Jeeson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anuradha KelkarDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Vishav Bir S ThakurDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.
Jacob JeesonDepartment of Radiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Acute intestinal obstruction is a commonly encountered surgical emergency that is prevalent worldwide and has substantial morbidity and fatality rates. Therefore, swift and precise diagnosis is essential. While mortality rates in urban areas have declined due to timely medical intervention following early detection, the situation contrasts starkly in rural areas. Delays in presentations often lead to complications because of hesitancy toward surgery, economic challenges, and limited access to healthcare information. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate how well multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can help determine the site, cause, and level of intestinal obstruction compared to what the surgeons confirmed intraoperatively. Methodology A prospective study involving 101 patients was conducted at a tertiary care center in western Maharashtra from July 2022 to July 2024. The emergency department referred patients with clinical symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, inability to pass flatus, constipation, or diarrhea, which are commonly seen with intestinal obstruction. The study involved all patients who underwent a contrast-enhanced MDCT scan using both intravenous and oral contrast agents. We selected patients from both genders, regardless of their age; however, considerations were taken to include characteristics convenient and relevant to the study. Patients with abnormal serum creatinine levels or allergies to contrast were excluded from the study. We conducted CT examinations, noting findings such as the transition point between the dilated and collapsed loops, mesenteric fat stranding, and intestinal dilatation. An experienced radiologist made the final report, and the operating surgeons' notes on laparoscopy or open surgery for the same patient were reviewed to understand the operative findings. Results MDCT scans had high diagnostic accuracy for small and large bowel obstruction. Of the 101 patients, the mean age was 43.7 years. There were 70 (69.30%) males and 31 (30.69%) females. Sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 98.1%, positive predictive value was 83.7%, and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusions MDCT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing and determining the underlying cause of intestinal obstruction. It identified the location of the obstruction and discerned whether it originated from intrinsic, extrinsic, or intraluminal factors.

Indexed as

abdomen paincect abdomenintestinal obstructionmultidetector computed tomography (mdct)small bowel obstruction

Identifiers

PMID39238754
PMCPMC11375312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.