ArticleCureus2024
The Effects of Different Attachment Types and Positions on Rotation Movement in Clear Aligner Treatments: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the impact of attachment designs on canine derotation in clear aligner therapy: a finite element analysis.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Tooth rotational control with varying attachment configurations in clear aligners under compromised periodontal ligament support: a finite element study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effects of attachment design and location on derotation of mandibular second premolars : A finite element analysis.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effects of attachment position and pressure ridge design on maxillary arch expansion with clear aligners: a finite element analysis.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- The Accuracy of Maxillary Canines' Rotation with Different Attachment Designs: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Management of complex orthodontic cases using aligners: A comparative study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Effects of attachment designs on clear aligner tooth movement: A finite element analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Iterative finite element analysis of clear aligner-induced bodily canine movement under alveolar bone loss conditions.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Clinical Success of Clear Aligners for Rotational Tooth Movements in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- The effectiveness of the attachment position in rotated premolar in clear aligner treatment: a finite element study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Can Natural Language Processing (NLP) Provide Consultancy to Patients About Edentulism Teeth Treatment?Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim Rotation of the mandibular premolars during aligner treatment is a difficult movement to achieve accurately. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different attachment types and positions used in clear aligner treatments on the rotation movement and retention of clear aligners in the rotated first premolar teeth. The study also addressed the stress values in periodontal ligaments (PDLs) with finite element analysis. Materials and methods For purposes of this research, we created a mandibular tooth model and modeled the premolar tooth with a 30° rotation. Twelve separate groups were created by attaching horizontal rectangular, vertical rectangular, ellipsoid, and semi-ellipsoid attachments to the premolar tooth in buccal, lingual, and combined buccal and lingual ways. A model without attachments was created to be used as the control group. An activation movement of 0.25 mm was applied to the first premolar tooth in all 12 models. The study evaluated clear aligner displacement, von Misses stress on the PDL, and tooth displacements using the finite element stress analysis method. Results It was found that the group with horizontal rectangular attachments placed on both the buccal and lingual sides had the highest stress value in the PDL (0.1971 MPa) and the highest displacement in the tooth (0.1267 mm). Conversely, the group with semi-ellipsoid attachments placed both buccally and lingually had the least displacement movement in clear aligners (0.1441 mm). Conclusion The results indicate that groups with attachments provided better retention than groups without attachments. Models with horizontal, rectangular attachments showed significantly more tooth displacement compared to other models. Horizontal rectangular attachments placed buccally and lingually combined to provide tooth movement in rotated mandibular first premolars can be recommended for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.