ArticleCureus2024
A Recurrent Case of Full-Thickness Macular Hole After Successful Closure With Primary Vitrectomy and Epiretinal Proliferation Embedding.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epiretinal proliferation (EP) is thought to be glial cell proliferation arising from the inner retina, seen in cases of lamellar or full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Embedding EP within the macular hole is considered supportive for FTMH closure and functional recovery. We report a recurrent case of FTMH that was successfully closed after primary vitrectomy with the EP embedding technique. In the primary surgery, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was avoided to reduce the potential risk of retinal nerve fiber layer damage associated with glaucoma. The FTMH was successfully closed, with complete recovery of macular layer structures. However, over one year later, the FTMH reopened, slightly dislocated from the position of the embedded EP scar. The reopened FTMH was closed again after the second surgery using the ILM inverted flap technique. This case indicates that macular hole closure with EP might not sufficiently support the tissue repair of FTMH as a new hole can form if tangential traction of the ILM remains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.