Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238708›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Karnofsky Performance Status at Discharge Is a Prognostic Indicator of Life Expectancy in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Shogo Sasaki, Shinji Tsukamoto, Yukako Ishida, Yasuyo Kobayashi, Yusuke Inagaki, Tomoo Mano, Tetsuro Kitamura, Naoto Seriu, Ichiro Nakagawa, Akira Kido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association of performance status, depression, and demographics with advance directive documentation in patients with glioblastoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shogo SasakiRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Shinji TsukamotoOrthopedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Yukako IshidaRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Yasuyo KobayashiRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Yusuke InagakiRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Tomoo ManoRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Tetsuro KitamuraRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Naoto SeriuRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Ichiro NakagawaNeurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.
Akira KidoRehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent invasive brain tumor and a rapidly progressive disease with a poor prognosis that predominantly affects middle-aged and older adults. The relationship between daily functioning and prognosis in patients with GBM will become more important as advances in multimodality treatment are expected to increase the number of long-term survivors. Methods Sixty-seven patients were initially diagnosed with GBM at our hospital between December 2013 and December 2022. All patients were divided into two groups: those who survived for one year or longer from the date of discharge (Group A) and those who died within one year from the date of discharge (Group B). Muscle strength, nutritional status, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were examined upon admission (p1), post-surgery (p2), and discharge (p3), and their relationships with prognosis were investigated. Results Group A was significantly younger than Group B, with a significant difference in the total radiation dose. There were no significant differences in the anatomical tumor location, whether the tumor occurred on the left or right side, or tumor size. KPS at discharge (p3) and the degree of improvement in the KPS between p1 and p3 were associated with a good prognosis. Conclusions The KPS varies throughout the treatment. When considering the KPS as a prognostic indicator, the KPS at discharge is the most important, given the structure of the disability and the course of treatment for GBM.

Indexed as

glioblastomakarnofsky performance scorelife expectancyprognosisthe structure of disability

Identifiers

PMID39238708
PMCPMC11376000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.