ArticleCureus2024
Right Bundle Branch Block and Rehospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe most important aspect of managing heart failure (HF) is preventing rehospitalization. Bundle branch block (BBB), particularly left BBB (LBBB), has been a known risk factor for worsening prognosis, whereas no such consideration has been made for right BBB (RBBB). However, recent research has shown that RBBB was associated with increased mortality. This study evaluated the effects of RBBB on prognosis, especially rehospitalization, in patients with HF. MATERIALS: This study included 698 patients admitted for HF. Those who died in the hospital (n = 31) and dropped out during observation (n = 143) were excluded. After one year of observation, the patients were divided into a control group (n = 361) and a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) group (n = 163). After further excluding according to electrocardiography findings, patients were categorized as having no BBB (n = 307), pure RBBB (n = 37), and LBBB (n = 56), and then the characteristics, clinical data, and prognosis of the remaining patients were evaluated.
resultsPatients were compared to no BBB, pure RBBB, and LBBB was associated with a risk for HF rehospitalization (p = 0.007). Furthermore, pure RBBB was independently associated with HF rehospitalization even after adjusting for confounders (hazard ratio: 2.40 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.58; p = 0.008).
conclusionPure RBBB was independently associated with HF rehospitalization, highlighting the need for vigilance against the risk of HF rehospitalization among those with pure RBBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.