ReviewCureus2024
Anti-Smith Antibodies as a Predictive Factor for Developing Lupus Nephritis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Sex Differences in Autoimmune Diseases: Immunologic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Combined Network Pharmacology, Transcriptomics and Metabolomics Strategies Reveal the Mechanism of Action of Lang Chuang Wan to Ameliorate Lupus Nephritis in MRL/lpr Mice.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent and lethal complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), often presenting with subtle or no initial symptoms. Therefore, it is crucial to identify SLE patients who are at risk of developing LN to ensure they receive timely intervention. Significant scientific efforts have been made to identify various genes and antibodies that could increase the risk of LN. Our objective is to review the role of anti-Smith antibodies in this disease and evaluate their potential as a predictive marker for LN. This review was done in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for different study types from 2019 onwards as per our inclusion and exclusion criteria, to look for the significance of anti-Smith antibodies. The following databases were used: PubMed, PMC, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Scopus. Twenty-two studies were checked for eligibility, of which 17 studies passed, based on the commonly used quality assessment tool for each of the corresponding studies. The study results indicated that anti-Smith antibodies are highly specific for SLE and are part of its classification criteria. In addition, we observed that positive titers correlate with disease activity. The presence of anti-Smith antibodies is influenced by ethnicity being most common among Black patients. However, the data regarding their effectiveness as a predictive marker for LN is not fully established. A more sensitive investigation and larger cohorts on diverse ethnic populations could provide a definitive answer regarding the role of anti-Smith antibodies in LN, highlighting the need for additional research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.