ArticleInterventional pain medicine2023
The safety and efficacy of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for pain in inferolateral quadrant of the knee.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous denervation for the treatment of knee pain.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Assessment of ultrasound-guided continuous genicular nerve radiofrequency for the management of persistent post-arthroplasty knee pain.European radiology · 2026Article
- Outcome and predictors of knee radiofrequency ablation for chronic pain relief: A retrospective cohort study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Article
- Effectiveness comparison of genicular nerve ablation for knee osteoarthritic versus post-total knee arthroplasty pain.Interventional pain medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective procedure to alleviate knee pain. This procedure has been proven to be safe, except in the inferior lateral quadrant (ILQ) due to its innervation being near the common fibular nerve (CFN). Given the complexity of this approach, pain physicians do not routinely perform RFA in the ILQ, leading to inadequate pain relief in this region. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 54 patients who had undergone genicular nerve RFA. Thirty patients had genicular nerve RFA of the knee joint including the ILQ innervated by the inferolateral genicular and recurrent fibular nerves, while 24 patients had RFA of the knee joint without involvement of the ILQ. We compared the outcomes (pain relief, function, and complications) in the patients with and without ILQ RFA at 3 months and 6 months after RFA. Results: There was no significant difference in initial pain and functional level before RFA between these two groups. After RFA, the two groups had comparable pain relief at 3 months (p = 0.06) and 6 months (p = 0.20), and similar functionality at 3 months (p = 0.29) and 6 months (p = 0.12). There were no reported complications after RFA with or without ILQ RFA. Conclusions: RFA of the innervation to the ILQ of the knee is as safe and effective as all other anterior quadrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.