ArticleInterventional pain medicine2023
A randomized controlled study of the long-term efficacy of cooled and monopolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic pain related to knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: 12-month and cost-effectiveness results from the multicenter COCOGEN trial.Regional anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Trial
- Cooled radiofrequency ablation for patients with chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: Pilot clinical trial.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026Article
- Long-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes After Cooled Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Adjunctive Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin Type A in Knee Osteoarthritis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Observational
- [Image-guided plexus and peripheral nerve blocks in modern multimodal pain management].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Article
- An update on radiofrequency denervation for arthritis-related knee joint pain: a synthesis of the current evidence.BJA education · 2024Review
- Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee osteoarthritis.The Korean journal of pain · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) is expected to become more prevalent. Although conventional therapies may provide relief they are not long-lasting. Persistent pain may lead to total knee replacement, which is not free of adverse outcomes. Monopolar and cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of genicular nerves is an effective option. However, either method may provide distinctive results depending on expected lesion size, a key aspect considering the anatomical variability of knee innervations. This prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and durability of knee RFA using a cooled probe or a monopolar probe of comparable diameter. Methods: This investigator-initiated, post-market, double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial was approved by the Western IRB. 79 subjects with chronic knee pain due to knee OA were enrolled in multiple locations of a single center. 75 subjects were randomized (1:1) into RFA treatment with either a 4 mm/17G cooled active tip (CRFA) or a 10 mm/16G monopolar active tip (MRFA) using conventional procedures. Primary endpoint was change in knee pain level (100 mm VAS score) from baseline at 24-week post-treatment. Other endpoints include change in functionality, global perceived effect, and frequency of adverse events. Evaluation spanned to 52-week post-treatment. Significance of results (p < 0.05) was calculated using standard statistical analyses. Results: Both CRFA and MRFA provided significant reduction (41 mm and 39 mm, respectively) of chronic knee pain at 24-week. At the 52-week visit, reduction in pain level was sustained for CRFA (42 mm) but seems to decrease for MRFA (31 mm). Improvements in functionality were also significant and sustained with both treatments, although tend to decrease with MRFA at 52-week. Most patients also perceived a very good/good effect of treatments along the duration of the study. Conclusion: RFA of knee genicular nerves for the treatment of OA chronic pain is effective for 52 weeks post-ablation when using a CRFA (4 mm/17G active tip) or MRFA (10 mm/16G active tip). The benefits of CRFA seems to be better sustained beyond 24 weeks than the ones of MRFA, although no significant differences were observed at 52 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.