Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39238665›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2023

Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: Pooled long-term outcomes from two prospective clinical trials.

Matthew Smuck, Eeric Truumees, Kevin Macadaeg, Ashwin M Jaini, Susmita Chatterjee, Joshua Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hematoma formation after basivertebral nerve ablation.Interventional pain medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew SmuckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford University, 430 Broadway Street, Pavilion C 4th For, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
Eeric TruumeesAscension Texas Spine & Scoliosis, 1004 W 32nd St Suite 200, TX, 78705, USA.
Kevin MacadaegIndiana Spine Group, 13225 N Meridian St, Carmel, IN, 46032, USA.
Ashwin M JainiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford University, 430 Broadway Street, Pavilion C 4th For, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
Susmita ChatterjeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford University, 430 Broadway Street, Pavilion C 4th For, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
Joshua LevinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Stanford University, 430 Broadway Street, Pavilion C 4th For, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vertebrogenic pain is an established source of anterior column chronic low back pain (CLBP) resulting from damaged vertebral endplates with pain signals transmitted by the basivertebral nerve (BVN). Type 1 or Type 2 Modic changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are objective biomarkers for vertebrogenic pain. Radiofrequency ablation of the BVN (BVNA) has demonstrated both efficacy and effectiveness for the treatment of vertebrogenic pain in two randomized trials. Here, we report 3-year aggregate results from two prospective studies of BVNA-treated patients. Methods: Pooled results at 3 years post-BVNA are reported for two studies with similar inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcomes measurements: 1) a prospective, open label, single-arm follow-up of the treatment arm of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing BVNA to standard care (INTRACEPT Trial), and 2) a prospective, open label, single cohort long-term follow-up study of BVNA-treated patients. Paired datasets (baseline and 3-years) for mean changes in Oswestry disability index (ODI) and numeric pain scores (NPS) were analyzed using a two-sided Results: There were 95/113 (84%) BVNA patients who completed a 3-year visit across 22 study sites. At baseline, 71% of patients reported back pain for ≥5 years, 28% were taking opioids, 34% had spinal injections in the prior 12 months, and 14% had prior low back surgery. Pain and functional improvements were significant at 3 years with a mean reduction in NPS of 4.3 points from 6.7 ​at baseline (95% CI 3.8, 4.8; p<0.0001) and a mean reduction in ODI of 31.2 points from 46.1 ​at baseline (95% CI 28.4, 34.0; p<0.0001). Responder rates, using minimal clinically important differences of ≥15-points for ODI and ≥50% reduction in NPS from baseline to three years, were 85.3% and 72.6%, respectively (combined response 69.5%), with 26.3% of patients reporting 100% pain relief at 3 years. There was a 74% reduction in the use of opioids and 84% reduction in the use of therapeutic spinal interventions from baseline to 3 years. There were no serious device or device-procedure related adverse events reported through three years. Conclusion: Intraosseous BVNA demonstrates statistically significant, clinically meaningful, and durable improvements in pain and function through 3 years in patients with primary vertebrogenic low back pain. BVNA-treated patients significantly reduced opioid use and interventions for low back pain.

Indexed as

Anterior column low back painAxial chronic low back painBasivertebral nerveBasivertebral nerve ablationModic changesVertebrogenic pain

Identifiers

PMID39238665
PMCPMC11373002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.