ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Prognostic Impact of Tumor Growth Rate During Second-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastric Cancer.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Despite the remarkable developments in chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC), rapid tumor growth is sometimes experienced during chemotherapy. This study investigated the association of tumor growth rate (TGR) during second-line chemotherapy with the prognosis of patients with GC. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 29 patients with GC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy between 2017 and 2019 at Osaka Metropolitan University. Of them, 13 cases with target lesions were classified into two groups according to TGR using a cutoff value of 0.25. Clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes were compared between the high TGR (n=5) and low TGR (n=8) groups. Results: The median duration of first-line chemotherapy was significantly longer in the high TGR group than in the low TGR group [median 298 days vs. 72.5 days, p=0.030]. Progressive disease (PD) was observed in 60% of patients with high TGR, whereas stable disease (SD) was observed in 75% patients with low TGR. The median survival time (MST) after starting chemotherapy was 488 days in the low TGR group but was not reached in the high TGR group (log rank p=0.215). The MST after PD was 145 days in the low TGR group but was not estimated in the high TGR group (log rank p=0.345). Conclusion: Based on the absence of significant differences in survival outcomes between the high and low TGR groups, sequential late-line chemotherapy might be considered important, even for patients with high TGR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.