ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Comparison of Local Recurrence Between LEN-TACE and TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma According to Lipiodol Accumulation.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local Tumor Response to Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization following Seven-day Lenvatinib Administration.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the intermediate stage; however, with advances in systemic therapy, the indications for TACE have gained significance. While lenvatinib (LEN)-TACE offers the potential for good outcomes, local recurrence has not yet been adequately investigated. Therefore, this study investigated local recurrence factors for each type of TACE, focusing on the lipiodol (Lip) value in LEN-TACE and conventional TACE. Patients and Methods: Fifty patients (50 nodes) with hepatocellular carcinoma and a tumor size <7 cm who underwent LEN-TACE or TACE between January 2022 and June 2023 were included in this study to investigate local recurrence and its influencing factors. Results: The local recurrence rate after LEN-TACE was 5.6% at 6 months and 11.5% at 12 months, whereas those after TACE were 6.4% at 6 months and 13.2% at 12 months (p=0.028). There were no significant differences in local recurrence rates according to background liver factors, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) values, sex, age, and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score. Lipiodol (Lip) values immediately after LEN-TACE were significantly higher than those after TACE alone (p=0.021). Multivariate analysis showed that LEN-TACE had a recurrence hazard ratio of 0.184. Conclusion: LEN-TACE provided good local tumor control. Local recurrence factors included LEN pretreatment, and Lip CT values were higher immediately after LEN-TACE. Thus, LEN-TACE after upfront LEN administration may increase the effectiveness of TACE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.